There are plenty of reasons, whether or not any are good is opinion.
Daniel Berntsson is known to be against authoritarianism, censorship and mass surveillance, three things which are growing rapidly globally and in Europe (specifically the EU) people are noticing it now for the first time.
Many believe (I have no idea if he is one of them) that it is easier to do when society and cultures are mixed. But they may not be against integration, immigration itself for example, but just the scale and speed.
It is surely no coincidence (without having to don too much of a tinfoil hat) that these ‘summit’ meetings and other similar ones started happening, and are all in private (allegedly for security - but in fact the only people not made privy to them are the voters/plebs), for a reason, along with what has been happening in the world since they really started about 50 years ago.
You are right (as is everyone) to question peoples motivations, but that should go both ways.
The poster below in the all capitals just sounds petulant and doesn’t really seem to get that they are making the same point back.
The people to be angry at, on every single occasion, are the government. Look at why x, y or z is happening. Disruption is as good a tool as many.
A sure fire way to make things even easier for them to control us all, is to bring in higher numbers and faster and confuse many of the people. While we are all looking there, they are locking down other areas at an alarming rate.
If it is so easy for the EU commission which is showing signs of corruption more and more (it’s as if they can’t wait long enough) to ignore or brush aside those millions today, imagine how easy it will be in a few years with higher numbers.
Question everything on all sides. Why is something happening and why are so many pushing against it?
Unfortunately, yes, it does often just come down to petty racism and ignorance. But I have little doubt that much of that is orchestrated too, especially when you see who is behind much of it.
The only thing capitals boy got right, is that there are bad people everywhere.
You have many valid points but concentration camps are bad. No one who supports breaking families apart for the sake of “sending them back to where they belong” is a good person. There is no reason for these camps.
I didn’t read that he was for that. I (I hope obviously) wouldn’t condone that on any level either. As most people wouldn’t.
I just meant that most of us would have no idea of his motivation, but there are legit reasons (specifically the three thing he has voiced against in the past) that might have helped make his decision, along with disruption.
I believe his motivation might stem from those, and then would wonder why he felt he had to make that decision, and look at the parties around him making the decisions, who’s lobbying etc… and question why that is too…
There are plenty of reasons, whether or not any are good is opinion. Daniel Berntsson is known to be against authoritarianism, censorship and mass surveillance, three things which are growing rapidly globally and in Europe (specifically the EU) people are noticing it now for the first time. Many believe (I have no idea if he is one of them) that it is easier to do when society and cultures are mixed. But they may not be against integration, immigration itself for example, but just the scale and speed.
It is surely no coincidence (without having to don too much of a tinfoil hat) that these ‘summit’ meetings and other similar ones started happening, and are all in private (allegedly for security - but in fact the only people not made privy to them are the voters/plebs), for a reason, along with what has been happening in the world since they really started about 50 years ago.
You are right (as is everyone) to question peoples motivations, but that should go both ways. The poster below in the all capitals just sounds petulant and doesn’t really seem to get that they are making the same point back. The people to be angry at, on every single occasion, are the government. Look at why x, y or z is happening. Disruption is as good a tool as many.
Only in the past couple of weeks alone we have seen SKG be pretty much pushed aside by the EU with over 1.5m signatures, a petition for questioning Israeli lobbying in the UK with almost 120,000 signatures forced debate and ignored, and Chat Control (which has failed twice) attempts to be reignited which is unprecented and goes against what the whole ‘poltical system’ is supposed to stand for. I am sure that there are many more.
A sure fire way to make things even easier for them to control us all, is to bring in higher numbers and faster and confuse many of the people. While we are all looking there, they are locking down other areas at an alarming rate.
If it is so easy for the EU commission which is showing signs of corruption more and more (it’s as if they can’t wait long enough) to ignore or brush aside those millions today, imagine how easy it will be in a few years with higher numbers.
Question everything on all sides. Why is something happening and why are so many pushing against it?
Unfortunately, yes, it does often just come down to petty racism and ignorance. But I have little doubt that much of that is orchestrated too, especially when you see who is behind much of it.
The only thing capitals boy got right, is that there are bad people everywhere.
You have many valid points but concentration camps are bad. No one who supports breaking families apart for the sake of “sending them back to where they belong” is a good person. There is no reason for these camps.
I didn’t read that he was for that. I (I hope obviously) wouldn’t condone that on any level either. As most people wouldn’t. I just meant that most of us would have no idea of his motivation, but there are legit reasons (specifically the three thing he has voiced against in the past) that might have helped make his decision, along with disruption.
I believe his motivation might stem from those, and then would wonder why he felt he had to make that decision, and look at the parties around him making the decisions, who’s lobbying etc… and question why that is too…