The Spanish government said on Thursday that it would deploy the army to Ceuta to reinforce security after the crossings, which saw many migrants swim around the border to reach the territory.
The Spanish government said on Thursday that it would deploy the army to Ceuta to reinforce security after the crossings, which saw many migrants swim around the border to reach the territory.
How many firsthand accounts do we have? I found Paul’s in Acts and Corinthians, but Paul also seems to have spoken for James. Did James or anyone else record meeting Jesus after resurrection themselves? I would especially prefer to hear it from more consistent and verifiable historical sources than the bible. The gospels were written in 70-100 AD, long enough for rumors to grow into legends.
No. If someone is going to die for something they saw, it means they believed it. It doesn’t mean it’s true. I maintain that it is far more likely that A) they made it up B) they hallucinated or dreamed it C) they were tricked, or any other number of explanations before “dead man who claimed to be a death god returned from the dead to prove his resurrection, but only to people around at the time and then he disappeared forever.”
What if you did not see what you think you saw? For example, it could have been some kind of criticism of Kim Jong Un, someone impersonating him and pretending to cheat. Or you saw him with his wife, but did not recognize her for any number of reasons. Maybe she was pretending to be someone else because they like it kinky.
Your willingness to die is only evidence that you were convinced, not that the thing you witnessed was true.
They thought they would be rewarded in the afterlife. It is a death cult.
I have provided many plausible alternatives, and scholars have more. Jesus can’t be god because god can’t exist. The old testament contradicts itself and our reality with surprising frequency.
For your area, maybe, but I suspect you were just ignoring the conflicts. Having grown up in southern baptist churches, I know my statement is factually correct, different denominations can and do fight over their interpretations of the bible.
But that’s bullshit. People “accept Jesus” to get saved. Then what? Then they are expected to obey him completely. It immediately becomes all about works, sustaining an abusive relationship under threat of supernatural obliteration.
The evangelicals I knew were insistent that everyone should follow their particular denomination.
So you’ve chosen to reject evidence in advance? Dishonest.
So no one is telling these catholics they’re going to hell? https://www.patheos.com/blogs/bluecollarapologetics/2024/05/all-catholics-are-going-to-hell-really/
What does that make other churches?
https://www.pravmir.com/do-all-non-orthodox-people-go-to-hell/
But they know it’s bad PR to say others are going to hell, so they came up with this complete cop-out:
“If they’re saved, they’re one of us… somehow.” Ridiculous.
Do you value individual experiences? How many Reddit posts do you think we can find where religious people are either condemning each other or venting about being condemned? How many points of data do you need to be convinced of a problem’s existence?
There you go rejecting evidence again. Let’s check the Jehovah’s Witness website:
https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/
And mormons?
https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/?lang=eng
I’m curious why you don’t consider them. If christ was here, we could ask him. Since he isn’t, anyone can claim christianity, and they have exactly as much evidential support for their beliefs as you do.
Your original quote was:
I asked for a citation, as I doubt the veracity of that arbitrary 95%. You said:
This is unhelpful, as we need a many-to-many comparison: many different denominations, and many different beliefs held by each.
This is ignoring a lot of violent history.
https://christianeducatorsacademy.com/the-ultimate-guide-to-christian-denominations-types-beliefs-and-differences/
Already we see three broad factions with fundamentally incompatible beliefs:
Hmm, interesting. So what happens when individuals interpret the bible?
We get even more division, because there is no standard and there never was.
How different are they? Quite. Does the trinity exist? Are we saved by faith, works, or both? Should we listen to a guy in a funny hat, a different guy in a funny hat, or whichever preacher is most convenient?
Are there divine consequences for choosing the wrong denomination? Depends on which denomination you ask.
They all claim to believe in christ, but they all have different interpretations of what that means, what his teachings meant, how to follow them, etc.
“You accused me of supporting terrorism, so I’m going to fund terrorists because you’re annoying” is a concerning mindset for anyone to have.
I can rephrase it as a more polite request: Would you consider making choices that are less likely to result in the needless suffering and death of yourself, me, and everyone else alive today?
But I feel that undermines the urgency. Your casual denial of reality is harmful, deadly. We can’t measure your christ or your god. We can count the real bodies left in the wake of selfish believers.
Please think carefully.