• deathbird@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    6 days ago

    Teen Boys Terrorize Girls at High Schools and Middle Schools in Very Public and Easily Tracable Ways and Still No One is Stopping Them

  • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    7 days ago

    Hoooold up just a minute. How much do these glasses cost? Like hundreds right? What kind of teen boy has that much money to burn? I sure as fuck didn’t, and I worked. Their parents bought them, and these are kids, so it’s 100% blame on the parents here.

    • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      7 days ago

      Even if the kids bought them it is still the parent’s responsibility to keep their kid from being an obnoxious pervert.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        That’s what really sucks about this.

        There’s no institutional backlash. (At least not yet. That could change.)

        We’re depending on parents who park these little shits in front of screens and expect to be left alone while their kids are radicalized.

        • 0xDREADBEEF@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          The alternative is having the rich parents be responsible for the children they breed and that will never happen so suck it up poors

    • Geologist@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      I had thousands as a teenager from around 15 years old working part time evening and weekends at barely above minimum wage.

      When you have no expenses from living at home, you can save everything (and in my case blow it all on electronics lol)

    • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      When I was 16 and started working, I quickly had enough money saved from working minimum wage, part time, to buy myself a car. It’s not impossible.

      Also, these may be kids/young adults, but they should all know right from wrong. Blame is absolutely on the students who use these too.

    • magnue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      No different to mobile phones or iPods or PlayStations. Pair of meta raybans are arguably cheaper than those items now due to inflation.

  • cloudshouter@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    6 days ago

    From the opening part of the article, the problem is not just the glasses. The glasses are definitely an issue that needs to be sorted out society wide, but there is a problem with how these boys are raised. Badly raised boys have always been an issue but now they are being raised by manosphere incel influencers. The glasses just let them record their harassment to post for clout and to draw others into their bullying.

  • Malyca@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    7 days ago

    I guarantee most of these schools protect the bullies and punish the victims. Like if a girl being harassed broke the glasses, she would get expelled. The world is the way it is because people enable and worship bullies across the board.

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      7 days ago

      This. My friend in HS went to guidance multiple times to complain about being bullied by another classmate. After the 2nd or 3rd time requesting thy switch his class, they decided to resolve the issue by forcing them to be partners for an assignment in class. He complained again, and was told to deal with it. One day my friend finally cracked and broke the bully’s nose because he had enough and clearly the school was only willing to make this worse, so they called the police on my friend. It’s pretty insane how some things get dealt with sometimes.

      • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        I wish they called the police when I stood up for myself. It was sexual harassment/assault but I didn’t know that at the time, I just knew I didn’t like it so used violence. He stopped and ran off bleeding all over the place.

        Totally valid self defence from a legal perspective. But they only used the threat of calling the police and I was absolutely terrified so just shut down.

    • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      7 days ago

      Schools don’t care about bullying or sexual harassment as long as it doesn’t look bad on them. If it can be swept under the rug, they will ignore it.

      At least that is my experience from schools in the UK.

    • arararagi@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      In a different video, the same boy films another upset girl approaching him with a metal stool in her hands. An adult intervenes before anyone is hurt.

      Exactly, they always protect the bullies.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Humans suck at looking at things on a long timeline. “Sticks and stones”. You don’t usually see the effects of years of bullying until adulthood. Or at least not immediately. A TBI, that’ll get you fucking sued. Emotional trauma? What’s that?

        Fuck they still try to blame school shootings on videogames and now tiktok.

  • jabjoe@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    6 days ago

    By there not being enough consequences for these boys, not only are you making more boys like this, but not doing those boys any favours either. No one mentally healthy is going to want to be with that kind of boy.

    Weak parents. Weak schools. Weak government. Failing everyone.

  • arin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    Stop blaming the kids, it’s the corporation’s fault. Title should be Meta glasses are recording and enabling harassment of underaged school children

    • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah. The kids are just the last part of the chain of failure here. Why is Meta producing such a thing? Why the fuck are parents buying several hundred dollars worth of spy glasses for their children and sending them to school with them without any supervision? And what the fuck is the school doing here? The first report of someone harassing other pupils with such a device should be reason to ban them and take hard discipline measures against the harrasser

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      These kids absolutely know it’s wrong. Stop enabling bullies. The kids should NOT get a pass for this just because some corporation did something wrong first.

    • mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      The glasses shouldn’t exist but what parents are buying these for their kids?! Blame the parents too.

  • nednobbins@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Can someone explain why this isn’t actually a solution to an old problem? We used to have issues with various forms of harassment that were not addressed because they relied on unreliable testimony. Now we actually have people creating hard evidence of their actions.

    The behaviors described in this article are banned in every school I or my children have ever attended. How difficult would it be for the parents of any of these victims to hire a lawyer to absolutely wipe the floor with these people? Don’t these videos basically put the perpetrators heads on silver platters?

    • Dingo_Kidneys@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      Crime usually comes before punishment. Right now the system is working it’s way into figuring out how to deal with this new social dynamic. Like you, I think it’s pretty straightforward. We won’t solve the core reason for the bullying dynamics though. I think humans that adhere to gendered thinking will be behind on that for a good long while yet.

      • nednobbins@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        It would be pretty messed up if the punishment came before the crime.

        My point, in this case is that the crime has been ongoing. Bullying and harassment aren’t new. What’s new is that we now have a lot of it recorded. This gives us an unprecedented ability to prosecute a class of crimes that people have been committing with impunity.

        The biggest downside is that it would likely be short-lived. If there were a bunch of headlines about people getting giant civil judgements, bullies would probably learn to be more careful about generating evidence of their crimes.

        That would likely initially focus on attempting to hide the videos from the general public but I suspect they would eventually learn that doesn’t work; courts can compel discovery. They would probably also try to modify their on-screen behavior so it doesn’t technically qualify as a crime but I expect they would mostly fail at that.

        That said there would likely always be some cohort of dumb criminals who continue to record their misdeeds. We still see cases where people discuss their crimes over unencrypted email and we still see cases of criminals taking selfies with their crimes

      • nednobbins@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Sort of.

        I am making an assumption that there are some people who are likely highly motivated to take action. Parents often care about bullying of their own children, even when the rest of the school doesn’t. We wouldn’t need all parents to care, just a few of them.
        I’m not assuming that lawyers are generally willing to work for free but I do assume that they like money and are willing to take cases on contingency, if they think the case is strong enough.
        I’m also going on my understanding that video evidence tends to be fairly strong and that this translates into a higher probability of a favorable judgement with less work on the lawyer’s part.

        So it’s less that I’m making an assumption than that I’m asking where the gap in the above reasoning chain lies.

  • Monument@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    People are being disgusting, using technology that was designed to be stealthy on purpose by others for disgusting reasons (to normalize allowing ever greater data collection by tech companies - no surprise the privacy protections are trivially easy to defeat), and are posting videos online for a reason - that they get satisfaction from it.

    I guess I don’t care if this makes me sound old or callous, but we need to bully these people. Make the people who post and share these videos embarrassed. Tell them they look like stupid losers who can’t get dates or talk to people. Make them feel bad for not being kind and socially connecting with others. Give them no community or understanding until they stop breaking the social contract.

    • chunes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      What social contract? The kids wearing these can’t value something they’ve never known.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      the only 3 usecases for these are:

      Assholes

      Perverts

      Blind people - sucks for them, because the first two are going to ruin it before it benefits anyone with disabilities

      • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah recording ICE activities might be another valid one

        Though that could be done with another type of concealed camera I guess

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          so I’ve given that one some thought and came away with this: if ice / pd detains you, they’re going to take your recording devices. I need my glasses to see enough to walk around.

          also, even more gross: they know what to look for, because until recently, ICE was using these devices. That’s been banned, but probably only because they’re making their own.

          https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/ice-banned-meta-glasses-now-154840012.html

          • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Oh look, they’d know and I’ll be honest, I saw someone else post that on here in another thread, liked their point and I’ve given it no thought other than looking like an observer, not recording. And, I’ll add, I’m not in the US so I don’t have local knowledge.

            I’d support their use case for it though.

            • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              perhaps? actually sounds like a project aaaand a privacy nightmare, unfettering these devices from whatever protections for the public meta engages in…

              I’m all about surveilling ICE and law enforcement but… I don’t see these devices as an alternative at the end of the day.

        • jumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          recording teachers should be another valid use, you would bot believe the number of times teachers don’t do their legally mandated reporting and brush everything under the rug

      • Echolynx@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yes but starting with an age limitation is a start on these damn things.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        How the fuck is this a “relatively normal” camera, or ANY kind of “normal”? People like you are the reason these companies get away with shit like this.

      • Echolynx@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        When it breaks laws. My area has two-party consent laws, so recording someone, whether audio or video, without their explicit consent is against the law. Children are often not held to the fullest extent of the law, and if they cannot be held responsible, then they shouldn’t have access to such devices until they can be.

        I’m not naive to think that these devices will just go away or that the genie can go back into the bottle. But that is where regulation must act to protect people’s privacy rights.

  • olenkoVD@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Here they’re not even allowing students to carry mobile phones inside of schools. How is this even allowed?

    • wittymyusername@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Here they’re not even allowing students to carry

      Thought for sure you were setting up an “Americans Love Guns” joke.

  • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yeah no shit letting people go around with concealed recording equipment is resulting in problems. Especially in a fucking school!

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      So the same bullying that always happens is now visible and that’s the core problem people see. The glasses, not the bullies wearing them or the bullying recorded. Watch teachers and schools fight the recording, that make evidence fall right into their laps, so they can go back to ignoring bullying in their schools and then act shocked when serious fights, or worse happen.

      • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Actually a good point, the bullying and sexual harassment was always there with or without the glasses.

        The glasses give them a new option for harassment, but it happens either way.