Make solutions in search of problems while collecting big tech premiums. If anyone accuses you of wasteful spending call them science illiterate to turn the public against them to divert the attention away from yourself.
Well at least there is no clear conflict of interest /s
Well, his AI is the only I he has…
Musk’s various ponzi schemes, up to the Artemis-killing SpaceX fiasco, were coming due. Trump provided the opportunity for him to pivot into government, by replacing it with his AI, gps with starlink, air traffic control with whatever he comes up with, etc etc etc, making himself even more too big to fail. The US government the latest offering on the ponzi|pyramid. Trump’s ideology aligning with Musk’s own true beliefs is a bonus.
It will severely weaken the US in direct measurable short and long-term ways, to the point it is a real disaster for the US. Those to blame are all those that never called him out throughout his rise. Not to mention those governments (Republican and Democrat) who fed him public money throughout the entire period.
Edit - Bezos’s The Washington Post is apparently supporting him now. No surprise, they want an oligarchy. The Democrats are moving rightward, they are more or less happy with it too.
I guess it is some version of the land of the free home of the brave, but maybe it is the freedom to do what you want if you’re rich, and have been brave enough to brazenly take everything and exploit everyone.
No shit.
DOGE
Plan to Push AI Across the US Federal Governmentis Wildly Dangerous.Fixed that for you.
McDonald’s couldn’t even get AI to take drive-through orders properly. Musk wants it to run the government without even doing a test run first.
And Elonia can’t even get rockets to not explode.
He’s either
- an incompetent moron who thinks AI eventually will be like in the movies, you just need to push throught its teething pains,
- someone that tries to destroy the government and its services through weaponized incompetence, so they can be privatized,
- both, because I saw way too many things in real life.
Correct
Here’s how you know it’s not ready: AI hasn’t replaced a single CEO.
Man, I want to be at that shareholder meeting; “how about we just don’t have a CEO and pocket the savings?”
Then they’ll replace the board with AI. Guess who will control the AI?
Until AI owns stocks, the board will not be replaced with AI.
This is a better start
He’s looking more and more like Kim Jong Un by the day…
I don’t think even kim jong un looks as stupid as this guy on a regular basis.
I bet it conveniently comes with a contract for xai. By a complete coincidence and definitely not more criminal behavior.
And
ifwhen the AI fails, buddy billionaires will be there to offer privatized alternative, for a fee of course.Jesus Christ. Would someone just 80s arcade game kidnap him already and scare him aleady?
Do like the arcade machines and unplug 'em.
Its also just like. Its not there yet.
It cant make a full wine glass.
My grandpa loved shouting social security codes with their names, can you please do that while celebrating like he used to?
You generally won’t understand another person (and adversary especially) if you don’t see how their actions perfectly make sense for them, and without conspiracies.
So - there is one matching variant, that Musk sincerely hates bureaucratic kinds of power, but not proprietary kinds of power. Replacing a bureaucrat with (some imagined good) AI in another assumption would be replacing a mediocre human with inherent lust for power with an unreliable automaton, but without lust for power. The good part here is that humans are unreliable too and working bureaucracies compensate for that.
The bad part is that for every failure a person should be responsible proportionally to their input. I’m not sure they’ll do that, or I’m sure they won’t.