• SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    First steps of windows install:

    1. No to everything for data monitoring
    2. Google or Opera default browser
    3. Disable or ignore all copilot icons
    4. Unstick all user folders from OneDrive
    5. TranslucentTB
  • Corridor8031@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    i think the whole problem is that they call it AI, which basically describes it as something that it just cant deliver

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 hours ago
      _____ _   _  ____ _  __   ___  _____ _____ 
     |  ___| | | |/ ___| |/ /  / _ \|  ___|  ___|
     | |_  | | | | |   | ' /  | | | | |_  | |_   
     |  _| | |_| | |___| . \  | |_| |  _| |  _|  
     |_|    \___/ \____|_|\_\  \___/|_|   |_|    
                                                 
    
  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    At this point, regular use of AI should forbid you from voting. It not only means that you can’t make decisions on your own, but that your choice can be affected by the people owning the AI service.

  • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    With 68% of consumers reporting using AI to support their decision making, voice is making this easier.

    sure, maybe as a reference tool. not as fucking something that can perform actions on my computer

    Second, it should be able to see what you see and be able to offer guided support. And third, it should be able to take action on your behalf.

  • medem@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    …and 99,99% of middle managers ‘’‘working’‘’ in tech be like yeaaaaaaaa daddy just cram that shit down my throat like I’m an abused goose!

  • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    With 68% of consumers reporting using AI to support their decision making, voice is making this easier. [1]

    Does anybody actually believe that 68% of consumers use or even want Copilot? But they included a source for this very generous assertion at the bottom of the page:

    [1] Based on Microsoft-commissioned online study of U.S. consumers ages 13 years of age or older conducted by Edelman DXI and Assembly, 1,000 participants, July 2025.

    Oh yeah, that’s compelling: US consumers, 13 years old and older. An entire thousand of them!

    So the only question I have left is which junior high principal Microsoft “compensated” for this survey, and what happened to the 320 summer school attendees who said fuck you, no anyway.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      they are equating “AI support” with “I want AI copilot integrated into my OS”

      and that’s a big leap

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 hours ago
      • 68% of people who answered the survey full of loaded questions they sent to a curated demographic
    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Also just because you have used AI doesn’t mean its overly useful. Gone to ChatGPT multiple times to try getting information that Google now is too shit to provide, and ChatGPT ends up providing some stupid response that is clearly wrong.

      Occasionally used ChatGPT to find a website to use as an actual source, but now those sources are also AI written bullshit that is clearly wrong. Which is increasingly concerning because while I know some things are wrong, I don’t know everything. How many other things that it points to are wrong? Its not too bad if you are able to verify it through non LLM sources, but what if you can’t?

    • cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yeah like we all use chatGPT for the most part now but that still does not mean copilot

      Fun fact though out of topic: I once searched for 2 girls one cup in copilot, and though it said I cant talk about it, it provided sources and one of them was a link to the video

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Yeah, I’d believe it. Outside of anti-AI circlejerks people like AI, especially ones like ChatGPT, and especially if it is available right at their fingertips. It’s quickly becoming a part of everyday life and processes.

      The anti-AI people need to start accepting that today and every day after it is going be the day that AI plays the smallest part in humanity’s future. The genie is out of the bottle and it’s never going back in. The sooner they can accept that and let go of the hate and see it for what it is - a useful tool to help you - the better and less angry their lives will be.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        How useful is it really? I constantly hear about it being wrong and I’m not so stupid that I can’t handle a search through Wikipedia on my own.

        Why should accept this thing that is of such little benefit to my life? Why should I accept this thing that is constantly wrong? Why should I accept this thing that just allows uncreative and insecure people to fill the internet full of garbage?

        If you need AI as it is to help you do things then I pity you greatly.

      • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I think the more important thing, is for people to push to make AI a public good, rather than a corporate hegemony. If corporations are the sole creators and holders of AI, they will do all sorts of terrible things with their mastery. Publicly developed and open-sourced AI that is free for anyone to use, is important.

        The refusal for the public to truly make AI their own, would be akin to letting corporations to control every single printing press.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        You make a good point, and the end of this movie remains to be seen (though I agree that right now it looks like AI is here to stay).

        I use AI pretty regularly to check for holes on some extremely long compliance documents for work, and the results in terms of not missing parts and reducing the time of the task is amazing, to say the least.

        However, this is very different from having an agent controlled by MicroShit seeing everything you do in what is supposed to be YOUR computer, and giving it all to MicroShit to do God knows what with your data.

        Yes, AI is currently the new smartphone boom, but there are many ways to use it without showing up completely naked in front of these assholes, especially since you’re not even given an option to cover yourself.

      • Silinde@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I think it’s important to still give a critical eye towards the use of AI, but at this point I think it’s clear that not only is the use of AI going to stop (even once the bubble bursts), but also that the top-end models are just becoming more and more capable every month.

        A couple years ago I was giving GPT-3 complex prompts and laughing at how bad and error-prone the output was, but last week I was using GPT-5 to give me information in a field I have little knowledge of, and it’s giving me perfect answers in seconds that takes me 20+ minutes to verify as correct, and that’s tens of times faster than actually learning the field myself. Even if I were to take a year to learn it all myself, I’d then need to not only retain all of that information, but also keep up-to-date on advancements in that field, which an AI will just do over time. This way I can concentrate on the fields of work I already know and follow, but can dabble in other fields without expensive retraining or bugging others in those fields with basic questions.

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        There is a vast difference between people using/liking AI and people using/liking Copilot.

          • dev_null@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            I’m not sure what your point is. There are many people that like AI but don’t like Copilot. So a statistic of people liking AI is not equivalent to a statistic of people liking Copilot. That’s like saying people love my baking because people like baking in general, even though I didn’t ask anyone about my baking in particular.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          So many people just immediately gave into ChatGPT, I doubt Microsoft’s actions will do that much damage. Besides, for anyone not using it it’s pretty easy to ignore. I don’t do a single thing on my PC that requires much beyond opening a game or Firefox so I don’t feel the pressure to leave at the moment.

          • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            36 minutes ago

            Ironically, one of the things that I’m moving to Linux for is the gaming performance boost that I’ve heard some people report due to the lack of Windows bloat and telemetry running in the background all the time.

            Bazzite, the Linux version I keep seeing people recommend for gaming and people new to Linux has had a big boost in users in the past 6 weeks or so, apparently, that people are completely attributing to Microsoft.

    • Vakbrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Honestly, big shoutout to Microsoft for the strong push to get me in Linux’s loving embrace.

      Double shoutout to them for making it very easy to not even considering to come back.

    • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That and backwards compatibility for Win7 & Win10. Shares of those OSs have gone up and several application developers have announced continued support or are advocating for unlocking/keeping secure those OSs.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve got two friends that are right in the edge of trying. One has a spare thin client that he wants to PoC with and was asking for distros and how to install. The other was thinking of jumping in the deep end with Arch, and I’ve warned him, but the wiki is solid, he’s not dumb, and Arch install is better than it ever has been.

    • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I have said the same as well. Prior to them dropping the fat grumpy that is 11, I was all in on the windows ecosystem for myself. I heavily modified it of course so it didn’t have a bunch of the nonsense but overall, the experience was good. But then they started warping 10, and then they came out with 11 which was massive garbage at release and now is worse garbage years down the road. And with that AI outlook, I’m full on bailing from everything.

  • melfie@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Making every Windows 11 PC an AI PC

    Great, so everything runs locally, making it a self-contained “AI PC”. Otherwise, the headline surely would’ve been, “Making every PC collect data to train Microsoft’s models with little benefit in return“. Right?

    • Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      What do you mean “little benefit in return”?

      Clearly, it streams a buttload of data!

      Your ISP bill will surely grow. Hope you’re not roaming with your laptop on!

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Microsoft is so incredibly fucked when the AI bubble starts to burst. They’ve abandoned so many of their other projects and customers to go all-in on it.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I dunno. I feel like they are like the cable company now. They will jus sit there twiddling their nipples while we are all fucked.

      • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 day ago

        I need the cable company (or similar) due to the fact that infrastructure is hard to deploy, and we need Internet to participate in society.

        Nobody needs Microsoft cause every single one of their products has an alternative that’s at least as good.

        They survive by courting enterprises, but many of them can also switch away if they want.

        • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          On a personal basis that works, but they are so corporately entrenched that their products getting shitier matters quite little.

          • cmbabul@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            1 day ago

            Seriously this, it would take something like the PCI or SOX declaring Windows outside of compliance for Microsoft to die from bad business decisions in the US. Although German gov switching to Linux starts treading a path through

      • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        They will be fine. They are second most valuable company in the world. They have money to throw around and their source of income still seem inexhaustible. A few new Linux users won’t even make a dent.

        Sorry to be so blunt, but it’s the truth no matter what we are wishing for.

        • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          If this was true (not that they are the 2nd most valuable company, that much is clear), why would they bend over and support W10 for another year in the EU while fucking up everyone else? There are ways for companies that seem to be immortal to self-destroy. Intel for example. Did any of us thought that they could burst 10 years ago? And look at them now, crawling asking for help.

          All you need is a seriously bad decision, then doubling down on it, and just watch it spiral down until they crash.

          The seemingly endless access to money only makes the process take longer, it’s not a shield from catastrophic failure.

          • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 hours ago

            It’s very much true. W10 was cause of pressure from companies and countries, not because of the odd Joe contemplating their os.

            Any company may fall, but they can also fail from inaction. Ms has the option to get data no one else can. They can’t afford not to.

            • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Yeah, that certainly plays a role. What really blows my mind is that governments and companies KNOW this about Microsoft, yet they choose to stay in their infrastructure. This world just keeps getting weirder every day.

              • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Yes and it’s not new. There have been failed attempts to get out of Microsoft by governments and companies around the world for more than a decade. Its hard. The cost is huge, the benefit vague and distant.

                The only reason why is gaining ground now it’s because US got really crazy. Not because of the cost of Windows licences. Not even because of invasive AI.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I keep parroting this, but in the next couple of years, I think there will be a couple of giants that fall. I work in ServiceNow and they, like many others, have gone all in on AI. Their problem is that they were slower than some, their solution is half baked at best, and it’s prohibitively expensive. Nobody is paying 10s of thousands+ extra for the licensing to be able to run agents, and less are paying the extra licensing required for the users to be able to use that agent.

      I’ve now been pulled into copilot studio, and yet again it’s another product rushed to market that isn’t ready for the big stage. Dog shit documentation and training material, and terrible environment design.

      All of these big players have invested so much money in adding AI, nobody wants it, and now they’re all hemoragging money.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Precisely my thoughts. Companies that are all in on this, except for 2 or 3 of the ones that actually are making headway on AI (as opposed to just mirroring Sam Altman’s ponzy scheme like Microsoft is doing), will eventually crash and burn.

        Look at Apple, they’ve been left behind in the AI race, but they have other good stuff thatsome of their fans will support (I’m using the word “good” very lightly here), and with their market value and endless cash flow, they are way more likely to still be here 10 years from now.

        None of us can see the future, but we can look at the signs. MS will never be a point of reference for AI, as that task belongs to OpenAI and Google exclusively for now (and Meta to some extent).

      • cley_faye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Their problem is that they were slower than some, their solution is half baked at best, and it’s prohibitively expensive

        Sounds like a lot of company these days.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hate to tell you, but we’re all incredibly fucked. Least of all Microsoft. They know what they’re doing. They most certainly already have a plan for recovery, as they know it’s coming just as well as everyone else.

    • Kissaki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      It won’t make a difference.

      What other projects they abandoned do you see as so critical that it would break Microsoft?

      • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I think that Microsoft will continue in some form regardless of what happens with this bubble because they have huge amounts of physical assets and cash on hand.

        That said, their market position in any given sector they’re in might not be as invincible as it seems. There are corporations that were titans of their industries, including technology, that either don’t exist or are ghosts of their former selves all in far less than a lifetime.

        Kodak, Xerox, Bell Labs, IBM, and Yahoo all looked like unstoppable juggernauts when I was a kid, and my own kids haven’t even heard of some of them.

      • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Copilot, Github, LinkedIn, ChatGPT are the ones that come to mind. All of them have started to degrade in quality in one way or another, and with the exception of LinkedIn, they all have competitors that could potentially, over the long haul, could dismantle Microsoft. They’re also running out of places to extend and extinguish.

        It probably won’t happen in one or two lifetimes, but enough cracks in a dam accumulate and eventually the whole thing breaks.