Probably yeah. A fireproof safe will be airtight, so the system can only produce as much energy as whatever reagents you put inside.
- 0 Posts
- 4 Comments
Joined 28 days ago
Cake day: February 27th, 2026
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
disorderly@lemmy.worldto
World News@lemmy.world•France will never take part in operations to unblock Hormuz Strait amid hostilities, says MacronEnglish
9·9 days agoIt also says “never”, but yeah, it’s a pretty bland statement when you put the context back in (literally and figuratively).
disorderly@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•CEO Asks ChatGPT How to Void $250 Million Contract, Ignores His Lawyers, Loses Terribly in CourtEnglish
131·9 days agoHoly hell, the fact that those slack messages and that chatbot history ended up in court is mind blowing. I guess we should be grateful that this time, the bad guy and his hamfisted “Project X” got put in the spotlight.

I assume you mean radio frequencies, and the answer is basically none. A grounded fireproof safe is basically a perfect faraday cage.
EDIT: Ok, I actually have a pedantic answer for this. If you put a microphone on a device inside the safe, you can signal it from outside by sending it vibrations, and you could encode a message in binary and thus technically send it a “digital signal”. If you wanted to be a little more analog you could use Morse code :)