That’s strange the rest of the article says that the sources are citing events which don’t exist.

Or wait let me guess you didn’t read it because you can’t handle the propaganda falling apart.

Did anyone verify them independently?

People tend to use the stuff they’re already used to. They could probably use Linux but if they buy a Laptop which has Windows preinstalled and they’re used to Windows it’s hard to get them to make the jump

What does the article explain then?

You’re right I googled his stance on BDS but got a different result. I’ll delete my comment. Thanks for the correction.

But if you were a professional photoshopper I’d imagine you wouldn’t work with Krita all day.

A lot is professional software. Many people have one or two pieces of software they use a lot which doesn’t run on Linux.

deleted by creator

No i mean actual hardcore. He only opposes some offensive weapons to stop Israel from committing genocide but he fully supports defending the genocidal Apartheid against retaliation.

He also opposes BDS and other measures to oppose Israel.

No Bernie is a hardcore Zionist.

https://youtu.be/nC6xiDKnMzA?t=23s

Go do some basic reading

https://theintercept.com/2024/02/28/new-york-times-anat-schwartz-october-7/

I moderate the community proving this utterly and completely wrong every single day.

You’re describing every PAC. Khanna can still deny the money.

It only tracks AIPAC money though. Bernie is taking J-street money and is somehow still green. TrackAIPAC is very corrupt.

Every instance has a different way to sort their frontpage and do rating. On lemmy.ml it’s almost all politics and news. On other instances it differs.

First time I’ve seen someone asking for less memes on Lemmy

I think some memes are good too. If it was all kids getting shot through the head many people would stop visiting because they can’t handle that.

Not really, nobody checks sources anyway. And if you do want to do that you can just open Google

Quoting a source is done if you don’t want to take personal responsibility to state something as a fact. But TruthOut has no problem using their reputation to certify the stories of Palestinians.

As long as Israel isn’t letting journalists into Gaza, there is no need to verify anything negative about Israel.

Unclear from the article but the story of Bahaa has appeared in a other news. This article is a compilation. It also references other cases. Not sure why you care if TruthOut spoke to him directly.

There’s tonnes of articles from other mainstream media which similarly reference other articles and I never see any questions about that. Whenever someone starts questioning sources on Palestine articles I am sceptical of their intentions.

I just noticed nowhere in the article did they quote the IDF. Are these writers stupid? They should learn from New York Times.

The big traders all have insider information on when Trump is going to accept a ceasefire. That’s why they all sold last time shortly before the “ceasefire”.

You’re betting against people who know exactly when the markets are going to go up or down.