Because they pride themselves on being edgy and love getting all political when it comes to Russia China and America.
Their silence is selective on Israel. They are cowards. If you’re a journalist avoiding talking about an ongoing AI genocide you’re not a journalist.
Israel is doing the terminator AI death software they keep fearmongering about. They didn’t cover this massive story back in 2024. CowardNexus. https://www.972mag.com/lavender-ai-israeli-army-gaza/
GN still pretending to be edgy rebels while avoiding talking about Nvidia building a 10 billion dollar campus in Israel and the AI tools Israel is using to commit genocide.
Proton made one positive comment about some Trump anti censorship policy. Their “controversy” is really overblown.
Mullvad is directly donating to Nazis.
That said Proton doesn’t have the same extreme privacy as Mullvad. But they are much cheaper with promos and also have good app support.
The Citizen Lab, which carries out forensic analyses of spyware attacks, released an analysis on Wednesday showing that at least one of the Serbians had been targeted with the NSO Group’s Pegasus spyware, which would have given the attacker “total access to the device”.
Of course
This was happening under Obama, Bush, and all those other “non Trumps”
It’s Final Solution but the person who wrote it has the intelligence of Patrick Star
Munition isn’t actually that expensive. As long as the munition is (a lot) cheaper than the drone, the math checks out.
Now let me tell you about the cost to build a giant laser with a limited range…
Yes, and that’s literally where power comes in. The more powerful the laser, the further it stays coherent
Yes that’s true but the power requirement (not to mention cooling) exponentially increases the further the object is because of the light spreading. The amount of burst power and light density needed for a long-range laser is bonkers and making it go further will requires exponential bonkers.
This is why they frequently fire them using pulses but even then getting them to destroy objects at a very long distance gets harder and harder the further the object is. If the drone flies near a laser then it works wonders. If the drone flies around the area laser then it’s not much more effective than simple airshot munition.
I checked the article but didn’t see a video in it so I’m not sure what the laser managed to do here.
Just because the reich can’t do something, doesn’t mean it’s not possible.
Maybe it is, but unless this interception was very long range they haven’t found the magical bullet yet and it isn’t much of an improvement over air-burst ammunition or interception drones.
That’s why there are shells which explode at a certain distance. But yes the general issue here is range. Shotguns are close range and cheap. Lasers are close range and expensive.
It’s not about power efficiency. Lasers require focussing a lot of light at one certain point. But the further the distance the more the light spreads. That’s just physics. Communicating with lasers isn’t the same as burning stuff with them.
Lasers are also utterly doomed when the sky isn’t clear because mist and clouds can fracture the concentrated light
As for intercepting missiles: If you’ve seen the speed at which hypersonic missiles come down you’ll find a laser doesn’t have much time to burn it.
Israel has been bragging about their epic laser tech for multiple years now yet they’re still firing interceptors. A laser might be able to defend one single static target in a 1km range from drones but not a whole border. And swarm tactics can still overwhelm the laser and just destroy it
No it’s missing drivers for hardware usually
Lasers massively lose efficiency over distance because the light spreads with distance. They’re horrible for long range targeting.
Starve the population to death until it overthrows its Communist government and then install a US puppet regime.
Guy’s a Nazi whether he knows it or not.
He knows it. He just doesn’t admit it.
Hamas did not rape any women. There’s zero evidence for that. This is what I mean with blindly repeating propaganda.
Here’s Norman Finkelstein debunking all the rape lies just yesterday if you want to educate yourself https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJBwJZhXM-g
this does not justify a military intervention in the country.
But it does. That’s why these lies are done. To justify the military intervention.
This is similar to the 40 beheaded babies and Hamas raped women hoaxes. Western propaganda makes up false stories because the real stories aren’t sobby enough (and the US is basically doing worse to black people on a daily basis). Then when the truth eventually comes out people have already internalized the propaganda.
Sure Iran has its problems but there’s a reason why writers need to make up stories to really get the demonization going. Recently we had the US-backed terrorist attacks in Iran during the protests where Iranian think tanks made up crazier and crazier numbers of casualties to justify US imperialism.
The latest US economic sanctions are actual mass terror against Iranian civilians but we’re not going to get any Guardian sob stories over that
Between 2013 and 2014, he also worked with IranWire.
Just FIY almost every English site with 'Iran" in its title are paid US propaganda think thanks. Iranwire is no exception. Just pure US propaganda slop of people making up stuff and the medium publishing everything uncritically.
Of course they have to write some bad excuse of why he returned and came clean. The biggest problem with Iranwire is this part from TheCanaray’s article.
But she (Mina Ahadi) has posted a screenshot of Deghani’s confession. In the accompanying caption, she says that Deghani had already confessed to her in 2010, and that he had begged her not to expose him in case he was sacked and sent back to Iran.
Which means even the accomplice says he CONFIRMED to have been lying all the way back in 2010 but he was afraid to be thrown away by the US propaganda machine and sent back to Iran if she outed him (at least that’s the excuse)
Yes it’s very reputable. Unlike TheGuardian they don’t make up articles. You could have simply searched the title than write a long comment.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/aug/06/sakineh-mohammadi-ashtiani-iran-interview
“The propaganda I have been fed by my media was a lie but I have internalized it anyway.”
Only for inference like the article says or also training?