moldy_rice

Are you the Dark Lord of the Sith in question? I would love to hear from you. Using a non-work device, you can message me securely on Signal at sam.404. Otherwise, send me an email at sam@404media.co

It’s literally a blank page. Try it in a text based browser

Site doesn’t load

Site doesn’t load

Link?

the viral Halloween campaign is pushing the backlash into far more extreme territory

Wut. No.

Extreme is building a network of hundreds of thousands of cameras that are used to lock a woman in a cage for traveling to exercise her abortion rights.

Extreme is cops using taxpayer dollars to deploy a network of hundreds of thousands of cameras that they then use to stalk women they want to abuse.

Extreme is building a network of hundreds of thousands of cameras and processing its data with AI systems that have false-positives of plate recognition, leading heavily armed police to attack innocent drivers.

Extreme is leaving these cameras up. Taking them down is a return to normalcy.

I’m seeing some very different looking cameras just in this article. Are they all flock cameras?

Does anyone have a link to a guide that has photos and model numbers of all flock cameras, so we can clearly identify them?

Sorry to take the pervert spin, but John Oliver showed us during the Snowden revolutions that if you frame this sort of news in the narrative of “the government is looking at my naked body during sexual exchanges without my consent”, then people will be much more outraged.

Seems like the long term solution to this is to make BFI data encrypted.

If this research gets properly picked up by the press and interpreted and written about from a “the gov can watch you having sex using your smart fridge” then there may be pressure on the WiFi standard to make broadcasting unencrypted BFI illegal in future devices

The article was very clear that this isn’t fingerprinting your devices. You could have zero devices, but you walk into a café and other people’s devices are all screaming radio waves, including BFI data, which bonuses off your physical body, forming an image of you

That unencrypted BFI data can then be listened-to by a nearby attacker who would process the data in a ML algorithm, and identify you with near 100% accuracy.

That’s what the article said.

Link?

Depends. Do you want your WiFi to work outside?

Or you could just disable BFI.

So, you’re telling me that my neighbor can see the size of my penis while I’m having sex using BFI data from my partner’s phone?

And I could make a 3D image of my neighbor’s breasts using the BFI data from her smart fridge and cell phone, just by listening to this unencrypted BFI data?

They’re using BFI to form 3d images using WiFi radios

Connected devices routinely send information back to the router to help optimize wireless communication. These signals, known as beamforming feedback information (BFI), are transmitted without encryption, meaning that anyone within range can potentially read them.

By analyzing that information, the system can generate images of people from multiple viewpoints. Those images can then be used to determine a person’s identity.

Nope. You just made the mistake of learning something else first and expecting other tools to match it

iode. I wouldn’t trust Graphene as far as I could throw its founder.

A man dressed up as a pickle shouts at…

That’s definitely Pickle Rick, c’mon

Yes. and their conclusion was that NGOs have been infiltrated by Cuba in a regime change operation 😅

Sure, but nobody does here :(

There’s loads of DDoS alternatives.

It’s a national security threat to give your httpa private keys to a US company. As a result, loads of alternatives exist for real DDoS attacks.

But also, almost any nonprofit social media site can just get away with a self hosted pow solution.

It’s not.