“This may speed them along.” Indeed.

That’s why I want to read the full survey (which I can’t find). The graphic is about AI, the article not so much.

Is it really? The results don’t promote. The journalist is not a promoter.

In this context: https://www.politico.eu/article/us-congress-judiciary-committee-big-tech-private-communication-eu-officials/

I cannot find the full survey, nor the website of the Observatory.

It is telling that the magistrates went to a UK newspaper and that it was then covered in the Belgian press: https://www.demorgen.be/snelnieuws/van-de-ene-dag-op-de-andere-moet-je-je-huis-verlaten-hoe-de-drugsoorlog-rechters-in-belgie-raakt~b08f2d2b/

Could it be that they decided to escalate beyond Belgium because they didn’t reach the necessary impact in Belgium itself?

I still have my doubts about whether this is not a fake. Except for that bio page, I cannot find any confirmation in English. It is custom that there is a statement from the university on the reasons why and a video of the event where the title was conferred. There is nothing of the sort, which is extremely odd.

She just spoke at the Munich Security Conference: https://securityconference.org/en/msc-2026/agenda/event/spotlight-on-peace-deals/

A week has passed. We know that Sigrid Kaag was in Davos “for work”. When a Dutch journalist accidentally bumped into her on the street, she refused to answer any questions.

Dutch media are not inquiring or asking questions about this, as far as I can see. I am flabbergasted.