cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/49853131

Feels to me like GrapheneOS did exactly what it should, passing the US border test with flying colours!

Funny part about this lawsuit: “With a little planning ahead of time, you can always download the data you need once you get to where you’re going,”

  • Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    From the article

    “The government’s indictment, which contains a typo (“Untied States Code”), accuses Tunick of allegedly providing a passcode to border agents that caused the phone to “delete the digital contents,” prior to the device being seized.”

    “When Tunick provided his passcode and the authorities entered it, “the screen went blank, flashed several times and the phone appeared to restart.” The authorities seized his phone anyway, before telling him that he was free to go and could enter the United States.”

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yes, and only JUDGES are able to make that determination.

      There is no stature in Federal or State law that says this is a crime, and no superceded precedent for this.

      • Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        No it can be police that charge.

        My state 100% has this law and police charge suspects for this.

        ORC 2921.12 Tampering with evidence.

        (A) No person, knowing that an official proceeding or investigation is in progress, or is about to be or likely to be instituted, shall do any of the following:

        (1) Alter, destroy, conceal, or remove any record, document, or thing, with purpose to impair its value or availability as evidence in such proceeding or investigation;

        (2) Make, present, or use any record, document, or thing, knowing it to be false and with purpose to mislead a public official who is or may be engaged in such proceeding or investigation, or with purpose to corrupt the outcome of any such proceeding or investigation.

        (B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of tampering with evidence, a felony of the third degree.

        • just_another_person@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          In your Section A right there: “official proceeding”

          There was no crime in progress, suspicious activity, or active charges brought against this person.

          Maybe reread the article.

          Also, Police do not bring charges, Prosecuting Attorneys do. Police are only responsible for investigations and arresting. Everything else is cleared by the legal system first.

          • Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            You didn’t even read past that. It then says “or investigation”

            I’m kinda done talking as you’re not even reading what I post.

            Good day!