A jury has found Elon Musk liable for misleading investors by deliberately driving down Twitter’s stock price in the tumultuous months leading up to his 2022 acquisition of the social media company for $44 billion. But it absolved him of some fraud allegations, finding that he did not “scheme” to mislead investors.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That’s it, again?

    JAIL TIME!

    If I steal a bread to feed my hungry children I’ll go to jail, but this guy ficks around with billions and all he gets is a tiny slap on his fingers?

  • brownsugga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Oh No, point 2 % of his net worth

    0.2%

    literally less than a traffic ticket in terms of scale

    • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I mean I dislike the guy as much as you, but almost all of his “wealth” is paper wealth. He may very well not be able to liquidate 2% of his wealth (fine with me).

      • iglou@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 hours ago

        He doesn’t have to liquidate shit, none of them do. They borrow against their holdings.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Point is that if I commit fraud or steal anything over 10 dollars I might go to jail

        This guy lies steals and cheats by the billions and he gets a hug

        Jail the motherfucker already

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Paper wealth and theoretical wealth, he will have to borrow that $2B using paper value as collateral.

  • All Ice In Chains@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Cool, so when this reaches Appeals court (which is where it’s absolutely going next because they’ll definitely appeal it), that 2.1B$ fine will get knocked down to 10$ and a blowjob (for Elon).

    But hey, the Washington Post or whatever can get a nice little headline out of it where they pretend billionaires face any sort of punishment in this Capitalist hellscape for 5 seconds so that’s nice.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      To be clear, the punishment wasn’t him loosing 2B, he wouldn’t even notice the difference. The punishment was being told he was wrong by a jury of his “peers”.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I don’t understand why these courts charge a set fine for stuff like this. This is clearly an extremely unique case. The man is 20% shy of being a trillionaire.

    What really needs to be done is they need to charge a percentage of his profits. Say 20 to 30%.

    • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This idea needs to be fine tuned. The problem is that parasitic oligarchs don’t have a real income.

      For those who don’t know, the parasite oligarchs take the vast amount of stock that they own and take it to a bank. The bank gives the parasite a loan with the stock as collateral. Right off the vat, the parasite gets to claim debt on their taxes. The parasite will then take the loan and use it to buy more stock or companies or anything that generates more wealth.

      Loan gets paid off with the generated wealth. Due to generous tax loop holes put into place by politicians). The parasite gets to claim that they didn’t make any money and get a tax bill of zero and sometimes a refund.

      • mechoman444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        This scheme is called “buy, borrow, die.” It’s legal. The stocks are typically not sold off, so capital gains taxes are avoided. Loans and debt are not taxable. It’s effectively profit with relatively low risk. The point is that the level of entry is extremely high. One must already have large amounts of money to qualify for these kinds of loans.

        The problem, of course, is that if you start taxing debt, like people taking out loans, it’s not just going to be millionaires, as you called them “parasites,” paying those taxes. It will be everybody taking out a loan, including the poor and the middle class.

        The proposed solution is to tax people based on net worth. If you’re worth above a certain amount, then you get taxed at a very high percentage.

        With that being said, if that were the case and Elon Musk were taxed like this, he would only pay around $12–$13 billion out of the roughly $800 billion he already has. In essence, it would still be pocket change to him.

        At this point, wealthy people not paying taxes has become a kind of game, who can pay the least.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      What really needs to be done is they need to charge a percentage of his profits. Say 20 to 30%.

      Lol. That’s not how the state serves capitalism. Fixed fines!!! Gotta put the burden the poor every time.

  • Triumph@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    257
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    If the punishment is a fine, it’s only illegal for poor people.

    The only war is class war.

    • cannedtuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      114
      ·
      2 days ago

      Considering he’s made $400B since acquiring Twitter, this was just a minor cost of doing business.

      • oyo@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        And there is almost zero chance he actually pays this. If anything, it will be a fraction of the amount in 20 years after he exhausts appeals and pushes deadlines to the max.

      • LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        Considering he’s made $400B since acquiring Twitter…

        Serious question: How?

        AFAIK, Twitter wasn’t terribly profitable before they sold to Musk. Then after he purchased it, the enshittification accelerated.

        How on earth does this result in $400 Billions in profit?!?

        • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Serious question: How?

          He didn’t actually “make” any money. He just stole it from workers, humanity, the planet, etc.

        • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          He made $400B, not Twitter. That’s almost entirely from Tesla and other ventures, not Twitter.

          Last I’ve been able to find Twitter was valued at $33B when xAI bought it. But that was clearly an overvalued sale. Just look at the valuation over time.

          And that’s just raw valuation which is easily manipulated, not revenue or profit, which can be easily manipulated.

        • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s not real money, and Musk isn’t the richest person in truth, not by a long shot. This is theoretical money based on overpriced companies that are propped up by what I suspect are some rather shady practices and investors using it as a casino stock.

          • theolodis@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            The money doesn’t have to be real for Elon to be able to use his stock as collateral for billion dollar loans. So he in fact has real money, that banks gave him, and that he will never pay back.

              • theolodis@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                It will only restrict his ability to get new loans, and make his collaterals worthless. But he probably spent most of the money they gave him, and like with twitter, he shifted the assets around in his network of companies, like a thimblerigger.

                But that’s kind of like saying that inflation will make the rich poor, which is also not true.

                • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  When stocks crash, his loans that are backed by those stocks get margin called, and he will have to sell other stock. If the government didn’t bail him out, and they will so this is academic, although he will have to pay them bribes secretly obviously that goes without saying, he would see a cascading effect from a recession because his companies are all so overpriced.

          • DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Actually worst than imaginable if you delve deep the psychology of the rich is akin to tumour development. Never forget these rich fuckheads would bet over your misery like a game.

      • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I could change the world for the better with this sum. Hell, even with the fee. Oh well, I’m sure it’s best that he has that money 🙄🤮.

        • then_three_more@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Some are, but they often have maximum caps.

          So for a UK speeding fine he’d get a £1000, but if it’s wasn’t capped it would be somewhere in the region of 340 million.

          Your Speeding Offence Details

          Speed Limit: 30 mph Recorded Speed: 35 mph Excess Speed: 5 mph Offence Band: A Road Type: Standard Road What This Means For You

          Your offence falls into Band A, which carries a fine of 50% of your weekly income. Based on your weekly income of £640,000,000, your calculated fine is £320,000,000. This has been capped at the maximum of £1000 for standard road offences.

          • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Finland has similar thing, but it is not capped. There’s a ton of 100 000+€ fines given around here. Obviously with Musk it would be a bit different, since the fine is based on actual income, not some imaginary monopoly money on the stock market.

          • slevinkelevra@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Disclaimer: I know you’re probably only trolling, but I’ll answer anyway:

            …not assessed in a way to be of sufficient size to not just be considered a cost of doing business. In other words, pricey enough to take away the incentive to not only take away the profit but to also deal a significant blow to the wealth of the richest person on earth.

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Believe it or not, everyone who you disagree with or misunderstand is not “trolling”.

              There is no reason they couldn’t assess fines a different way…

              Certainly the fines were sufficiently sized in the 90s era when they dropped the hammer on Microsoft.

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Just because they’re currently assessed that way doesn’t mean they can’t be assessed a different way…

                • Ulrich@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  24 hours ago

                  I don’t understand what your point is. No one is saying it’s going to happen tomorrow. The point is that fines themselves aren’t the problem. The problem is corruption and cronyism. Fines are totally effective when implemented properly.

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    2 days ago

    For the rest of us, there would be a seizure of assets and a prison term.

    • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Basically, and it’s not even like this is a corporation that has some level of money machine go burr, it’s straight up one man who did this and is responsible it should be cut and dry and he should be spending the next few decades in prison.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t know how much he has liquid. The article says that “most” of his 814B is tied up in Tesla stock. Selling a couple of billion worth of stock isn’t trivial.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      2 days ago

      Except he almost certainly won’t be paying anywhere near that amount, if anything.

      • org@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Right, he’s just not gonna pay. It’s not like they’re gonna go get the money from his bank account. Can you imagine Elon Musk being garnished? Never gonna happen

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Is this your first time in capitalism? That’s how every fine works. There are no punishments for the privileged.

      The president is a pedophile who has been prosecuted for like 30 felonies. They’re not fining the creep at all. That’s reality.

    • yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      This does not work because he will find a way to have 0 income (legally). I don’t know how we can make the billionaires pay, but we should tax the assets not the incomes.

    • TronBronson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s the problem with Mr. musketeer he doesn’t actually show income. That’s why we’re always complaining about how billionaires don’t pay income tax.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It should be the amount he made from it + a fine. It’s how the middle class gets handled.