• 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    The article lies, as I clearly stated above. Citing the article, without any further proof than the authority of the article itself, does not disprove that…

    If it was a blockade, then why do the Russian ships go though?

    Where is the US declaration of blockade? There isn’t one. Because there is no blockade.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      So the only thing making it not a blockage, is letting Russian oil tankers through?

      It couldn’t be that there IS a blockade, but Trump can’t say no to his boss, so Russian oil is the exception?

      Because Trump is a traitor, and this only the 1000th time he’s proven it to us.

      • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        So the only thing making it not a blockage

        Is that the word “blockade” has an actual definition. And this isn’t it.

        is letting Russian oil tankers through?

        Any tanker from any country can pass. As long as they are willing to bear the US being mad at them.