cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/51070777

“Yet, they never have the funds for healthcare coverage for all,” said Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib.

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Aren’t Argentinan soy farmers basically stealing American soy farmer’s sales? Its almost like American farmers voting for this City Slicker Real Estate loser hate themselves or something.

    • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Health care somewhat pays for itself. Not the really sick people, but making sure workers are healthy to actually work properly has a massive return on investment.

      The other part is taking care of general health. Things like cars, bad food, all sorts of pollution and so forth really are bad for health. If you have public health care it is often cheaper to fix the underlying issue then to treat the problems coming from it.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      0, USA has no interest in giving people free or extremely subsidized healthcare, they lose thier political wedge issues, trump card for both sides. the DNC can say they would to wet thier appetite, and the GOP can say they are against it, because of this or that is not effective. and also REPUBLICAN recepients make up a large percentage of medicaid, snap benefits too.

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    2 days ago

    $40 billion was the entire annual budget of USAID. No matter what you think of them, they did provided essential aid to dozens of nations, and DOGE destroyed them under the pretense of lowering the deficit. Now we’re spending that much money just to prop up one countries economy.

    (Yes, I know they USAID is a soft-power tool of American imperialism, and is rumored to have been used as cover for CIA operations, but they also did a shit-load of global AIDs prevention work, and I’d rather have spent the $40 billion on that than bailing out a libertarian freak so Rob Citrone can get rich.)

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I mean the entire doge “savings” were instantly wiped out by the $200 billion increase in military spending. And I say savings incredibly generously because there are a ton of studies that say the agencies and people they cut will leave a hole in federal capabilities that will end up costing the American people way more than all of the money they claim to have saved (Some speculate the massive cuts to the IRS alone will end up costing about $1 trillion in lost tax collections).

      But this combined with the cost of the shutdown and the farmer bailout and so much more is just icing on the cake I guess.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        has he even started bailing out the farmers yet? the gop is hoping the Ds come back into the power, so the gop can mess it up next election again. it will be a problem if the gop is still in power and they dont get to blame the Ds anymore.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh yeah, for sure. Everything DOGE did was a farce, and it almost certainly lost more money than it saved. Even en if it didn’t, they blew any savings up on their first budget legislation. I just find it particularly hypocritical to cut $40 billion in global aid because, “we don’t have the money,” then turn around and spend $40 billion on global aid to a single country

  • perestroika@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    First of course, it’s disrespectful to make insinuations to a sovereign country about whom they may vote into office.

    Secondly, Trump doesn’t have authority to give loans.

    He’s probably trying to deceive Argentinian voters with false hope of generous loans (which have to be paid back, I should note).

    However, in the US, financial decisions are made by Congress. Certainly on the scale of tens of billons. The president has discretion to move far smaller sums.

    • mcv@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 days ago

      Isn’t there a shutdown? Because they can’t agree on a budget? And now there’s no money even to pay government employees? So where is this money suddenly coming from?

  • CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Americans get the government they deserve (and voted for) 🐆🐆🐆🐆🐆🐆🐆🐆🐆🐆🐆🖕🇺🇸

  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Out of curiosity, what does this do to the USD? I know it is a “small” amount relative to our country, but if they are swapping $40b in U.S. Dollars for a currency of high volatility, isnt it a guaranteed loss of believed stability in those USD up to that amount?

    • icelimit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Soft power I guess? Maybe strings to dump us agricultural produce that is losing their market due to taco shenanigans.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Lol soft power.

        Oh you mean like all of the soft power that we built up over the past 80 years and has been completely wiped in the past 10 months?

        Soft power like that?

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Actually thanks to US money, Argentina was able to support its farmers by lower export tariffs for soy beans. They then sold a hell of a lot of those to China. Soy beans used to be the biggest US export to China…

        • icelimit@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Maybe in turn us gets to sell it’s GMO seeds to Argentina exclusively, displacing local seeds/agricultural self sufficiency forever? Idk

          • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Milei wants to dollarize Argentina. Ones you do that, it is very hard to move to your own currency again and it would give the US massive influence over Argentina. The good news is that Argentina has a much more functional democracy then the US and their parliament is stopping Milei from doing too much bs. So probably this is going to fail.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I kinda missed part 1 of the story; what’s the deal for Trump here?
    He wouldn’t be doing this if there wasn’t something in it for him.


    Oh and just in case somebody isn’t 100% clear what Milei is about:

    While Milei has drastically slashed inflation, the reduction has come via the devaluation of the peso and massive cuts in government spending, including the evisceration of social programs resulting in more expensive housing, healthcare, and education.

    And Trump doing mafia style threats again:

    “If he loses, we are not going to be generous with Argentina,” Trump told reporters. “I think he’s going to win, and if he wins, we’re staying with him, and if he doesn’t win, we’re gone.”

    Lawmaker Margarita Stolbizer:

    “Trump tells us Argentines that if we don’t vote for Milei, we’ll be punished,” she added. "The interference is absolute, the libertarian surrender is total.

    • hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      2 days ago

      Argentinian government debt is mostly owned by big American investment firms like Black Rock. If their economy crashes, American Oligarchs lose $$$$ so they convinced Trump this is in his best interests.

    • finitebanjo@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      TBH I don’t try to understand Trump, he’s a dumbass and everything he touches turns to shit, but hypothetically IF he weren’t a concaveman, a moron of the fourth and highest order of dumbfuckery, and instead some other president then the play would be increasing US authority in South America either preemptively or as a direct response to eastern influences like Russia and China. You know. The same shit that’s been going on for almost a hundred years, now. It’s called a cold war.

      But again, I don’t think Trump’s capable of rational thought.

      • dublet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        the play would be increasing US authority in South America either preemptively or as a direct response to eastern influences like Russia and China.

        Maybe, if there was a smart big thought in that brain. This will be simpler, as they will just build a building or two, a tower and hotel or something with his name on it. In exchange for $40 bil of other people’s money. He doesn’t care about strategy or geopolitics, this guy is 100% about the corruption and the personal benefit, the quid pro quo, he’s the mob president.

    • az04@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think that article is not well researched. Devaluing the currency causes inflation (in Argentina’s case), not the opposite. In fact, Milei did not sufficiently devalue the peso, because devaluing further would have caused more inflation. It’s exactly because he did not sufficiently devalue that the peso is now in crisis.

      I don’t know about the other ones, but under Milei housing listings have become cheaper, when adjusted for inflation.

    • Soktopraegaeawayok@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      Im all about Milei. Im all about reducing the size of bloated governments and frivolous spending. Governments love to pay useless people to do useless and many times redundant work. I understanding these are people with jobs and paychecks, and people should be able to have a good job and pay check, but not pointlessly and at the expense of the tax payers.

      • xyzzy@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        What do you do? Let me judge how useless you are and how useless your job is.