MotoAsh

lol so you defend that which you do not even use and that which you do not undertand? What a joke…

My hatred is anything but blind, and you calling it such is sealioning beyond belief. I love your hypocrisy… An Apple user without even using Apple products… Truly, your lot in life is more dreary than you could ever admit.

Agile SHOULD have a lot of the things ‘traditional’ management looks for! Though so many, including many college teachers I’ve heard, think of it way too strictly.

It’s just the time scale shrinks as necessary for specific deliverable goals instead of the whole product… instead of having a design for the whole thing from top to bottom, you start with a good overview and implement general arch to service what load you’ll need. Then you break down the tasks, and solve the problems more and more and yadda yadda…

IMO, the people that think Agile Development means only implement the bare minimum … are part of the complete fucking idiot portion of the industry.

Fuck man, why don’t more ethical-ish devs join to make stuff? What’s the missing link on top of easy sharing like FOSS kinda’ already has?

Obviously programming is a bit niche, but fuck… how can ethical programmers come together to survive under capitalism? Sure, profit sharing and coops aren’t bad, but something of a cultural nexus is missing in this space it feels…

Really proving how intelligent Apple fans are with that reading comprehension… The argument referenced there is obviously referencing the arguments you brought up elsewhere on the internet between Apple fans and other fans.

It’s not out of nowhere. This is a topic about how people maybe should not give Apple money if they don’t want to support a corporation that will bow to fascists.

How stupid and captured their dumbass fans are is DIRECTLY related to how easy it’d be to convince them to not keep throwing money at Apple.

The fact you cannot even follow a basic conversation is the only pathetic thing here.

You’re right, they shouldn’t be stressing either resource. Though my point was that referencing how much RAM is in the system is a bit silly when referring to a CPU being pinned at 100%. There is a HUGE swathe of CPUs with an even bigger range of performance that are all sold in 32GB systems.

I’m positive the low end of that scale could be rightfully pinned at 100% for certain common tasks.

Exactly. I don’t know why I’m being downvoted for describing the thing we all agree happens…

I don’t blame the students for not being seasoned professionals. I clearly blame the executives that constantly replace seasoned engineers with fresh hires they don’t have to pay as much.

Then everyone surprise pikachu faces when crap is the result… Functionally idiots is absolutely correct for the reality we’re all staring at. I am directly part of this industry, so this is more meant as honest retrospective than baseless namecalling. What happens these days is idiotry.

Probably because all the dummies are finally realizing it’s a fucking stupid slogan that’s constantly being misinterpreted from what it’s supposed to mean. lol (as if the dummies even realize it has a more logical interpretation…)

Now if only they would complete the maturation process and realize all of the tech bro bullshit runs counter to good engineering or business…

Removed by mod

Microsoft might prove that one wrong if they keep enshittifying Windows.

lol you’re just plain wrong on that. Apple fans these days are like you: They make fun of everyone outside of their group instead of the products themselves, because you all understand you won’t ever be winning an objective argument.

No. No it doesn’t, ALL human-like behavior stems from its training data … that comes from humans.

Well, it’s also stupid to use RAM size as an indicator of a machines CPU load capability…

Definitely sending off some tech illiterate vibes.

Edison was DEFINITELY not unique or new in how he was a shithead looking for money more than inventing useful things… Like, at all.

Yes, if you factor in the source of disposable culture: capitalism.

“Move fast and break things” is the software equivalent of focusing solely on quarterly profits.

Definitely part of it. The other part is soooo many companies hire shit idiots out of college. Sure, they have a degree, but they’ve barely understood the concept of deep logic for four years in many cases, and virtually zero experience with ANY major framework or library.

Then, dumb management puts them on tasks they’re not qualified for, add on that Agile development means “don’t solve any problem you don’t have to” for some fools, and… the result is the entire industry becomes full of functionally idiots.

It’s the same problem with late-stage capitalism… Executives focus on money over longevity and the economy becomes way more tumultuous. The industry focuses way too hard on “move fast and break things” than making quality, and … here we are, discussing how the industry has become shit.

No, they’re pointing out the chilling effect of shitting on the topic.

You’re the kind of fuckwit that would say Chris Hansen does no good against predators because he’s one guy doing a small set of stings… You’re the kind of guy who’d shit on a compromise policy that’s otherwise still a step in the right direction. You’re the kind of guy to make good the enemy of great.

and you have the gall to use insults when YOU are the one committing the social faux pas…

Pathetic. If you’re going to point out flaws, be constructive with it. Otherwise it is still on YOU if someone assumes negative intent from unconstructive criticism.

It would definitely be a bit more annoying to program, and a bit more naggy to the user for permissions during setup I’m sure, and running in the background would take some finagling and extra work and iOS could still kill it in the background on you … but otherwise it’d be the same.

Apple fans are not that type of person, though. They’re better than everyone else, and so is their owning entity! They can do no wrong, this app was obviously guilty of doxxing cops …

That won’t protect shit. You need laws that actually protect and preserve privacy. Otherwise they’ll just find some loophole. Like the NSA in the US. Not supposed to get searched without a warrant to the point where evidence gathered in such ways is supposed to be inadmissable in court… But your data isn’t your property.

Even if it were your property, you’d have to add protections so that just because a company handles your data doesn’t magically make it their data to sell for profit so it ends up spread far and wide and hackable in dozens of databases around the world.

If you don’t protect PRIVACY and your right to control your own data, they’ll just say they can force companies to use more hackable methodologies instead of an outright back door. They’ll just force government ID to get on the web so even just your comms patterns without the content can be very telling. They could even simply force companies to forward the data some other way after the data legally becomes the company’s data…

If you try to protect “from mass surveilance” without understanding the legal avenues in which your data is extracted… you’ll just end up making room some other way while innoculating the tech illiterate public from how vulnerable their data still is.

Remember, nobody thought there was mass surveilance in the US until Snowden leaked it… Even then, the tech illiterate do not understand how it is EXACTLY a runaround of the fourth amendment.

Yea, hence my last sentence. The solution isn’t to excuse them but to realize the full scope of the problem, and how it is very engrained in society. A great step would be to stop allowing willfully inept people any power in the first place.