• wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    No country should have nukes, and more countries acquiring them makes that goal even harder to achieve.

    • ryannathans@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      If some countries have nukes, probability of nuclear attack is high

      As more countries have nukes, probability of nuclear attack drops significantly

      It’s impossible to have zero countries with nukes anymore, someone will always have secret nukes, which leads to high risk

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        As more countries have nukes, the chance goes up. More leaders have the opportunity to pull the trigger. It only takes one crazy guy taking power. Or one nuke left improperly secured, especially in an unstable country, and then it gets stolen and used, even as a dirty bomb.

        • xenomor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          This exactly. The most significant result of hoisting up nonproliferation as a virtue has been to sustain and grow US hegemony. That is a bad deal for everyone, including Americans.

    • venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah but who’s gonna stop them? I know that’s the right answer for a pageant contestant, but be realistic.