As details of the death toll for January’s protests continue to emerge, three students explain why they are resisting a return to normality

More than 45 days after a brutal January crackdown that left thousands of Iranian protesters dead, students across several universities are protesting again. As Iran’s new academic term began on Saturday, students in Tehran gathered on campus, chanting anti-government slogans, despite a heavy security presence and plainclothes officers stationed outside university gates.

The Guardian spoke to protesting students about why they were rallying despite the fact that thousands had been killed and tens of thousands arrested in the January demonstrations.

“Our classrooms are empty because the graveyards are full,” said Hossein*, 21, a student at the University of Tehran. “It’s for them – our friends, classmates and compatriots, who were gunned down in front of our eyes, that we decided to boycott the classes.”

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why is it the responsibility of the US? I’m old enough to remember being (rightfully) shunned for doing the same fucking shit in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why did the US invade Afghanistan? Why did they invade Iraq?

      Do you believe the US is considering a ground invasion of Iran?

      (ps I don’t advocate it’s their responsibility, mainly arguing about opposing any intervention)

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        because of lies and oil as always. there wasnt any us intervention in the middle east in history that left the country better. evil fucking empire.

        • perestroika@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Please don’t lump Afghanistan and Iraq together.

          Afghanistan had no oil. The US invaded because it was attacked by a group based in Afghanistan. The end was a mess, but the invasion was justified. This has been the only time NATO article 5 has been activated, by the way.

          Iraq has oil. The US has invaded twice. Once because the UN authorized restoring the independence of Kuwait, after Iraq had invaded Kuwait. The second time because emperor Bush II lied to everyone about weapons of mass destruction. The end was a mess, of course.

          Does this have any predictive value for Iran?

          I can only tell this:

          • I see no preparations for a land war
          • regimes may sometimes fall after suffering a military defeat
          • only one regime has fallen recently because of an air intervention (Gaddafi in Libya, but the Libyan civil war had already started at this time)

          As a result, I am not convinced of any outcome, I do not support and do not oppose, I observe and try to understand.

          • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            group based in Afghanistan

            bankrolled by the US to further their nefarious interests in the region. when they turned against the empire by attacking the wtc, the us responded by… genociding it’s people.

            none of this was justified at all.

            • perestroika@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              bankrolled by the US to further their nefarious interests in the region.

              A long time ago. In response to the USSR couping and occupying Afghanistan. Which was, of course, also not justified.

              If Afghanistan had been left alone, things would very likely be better in several countries…

              • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                the us funded terrorists in the region to destabilize it so socialism didn’t succeed. it had nothing to do with the now-obvious “protecting democracy” excuse, as always with us imperialism worldwide, tbh. i mean it’s no wonder the us is so hated in the global south.

                A long time ago

                not a long time. the us funded al qaeda until the early 90s. their retribution came barely a decade later. an entire country then suffered for it.

                the us wouldn’t have as much influence in the region (and so much free reign for genocide) if they had left afghans alone.

          • Riverside@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            22 hours ago

            By not subjecting them to criminal economics mic sanctions, which are known to murder more than half a million people yearly?

            • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Why not use sanctions? What universal law is there that we cannot, under any circumstances, block economic interaction? Governments unable to block trade might be the ultimate capitalist dream but there’s no reason sane people should be forced into it.

              • Riverside@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                19 hours ago

                What part of “US sanctions murder half a million people yearly” do you not understand or care about?

                • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  For starters: the absolute vagueness of it

                  Say that I’m doing some genocides and you decide you don’t want to trade with me anymore because of it. If that means I run out of money and my baby starves, would you have remorse?

                  (This is a simplified allegory of the situation, but I hope you care enough about the world to understand the comparison)

          • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            by keeping your grubby arrogant hands off of it and stop lying about it. huge improvement already.

          • freagle@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            We don’t. Stop being a chauvinist. The Iranian people, together, improve things for themselves. Our responsibility is to dismantle the Western imperialist machine that has killed almost 40 million people in the last 50 years through sanctions alone

              • freagle@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Because you don’t live in Iran and it’s not your responsibility. Your responsibility, depending on where you live, is to dismantle the closest link to you in the chains that hold the world in imperial bondage, which is the Western machine helmed by the USA.

                  • freagle@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Because toppling the Iranian government is aligned with empire’s goals and creates positive reinforcing outcomes for the empire. So either you fight the empire and frustrate its goals in Iran, or you support the empir by bringing about its goals in Iran even if your heart is pure.

      • freagle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        So you’re arguing that some interventions by the US that led to hundreds of thousands or millions of civilian deaths, long-term cancer and birth defects, total destruction of civilian infrastructure, and decades of neocolonial extraction are somehow justifiable?