The lack of a U.S. carrier in the Pacific may be short-lived if the Navy deploys another in the next couple of months. But it shows how the open-ended operations with Iran are running some American sailors ragged, analysts say, while the Trump administration further retreats from the Asia-Pacific region and focuses on the Western Hemisphere.

“The administration says that the Pacific is supposed to be the most important behind the Western Hemisphere,” said Greg Poling, director of the Southeast Asia Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Instead, the U.S. is “doing the exact opposite” of its previously expressed goal of pulling out of the Middle East.

  • nednobbins@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Why would RAM prices go up? The normal process for China seems to be to scale up and massively cut prices.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Not sure if it’s true, but I’ve heard that Taiwan will destroy their fabs if invaded. Or maybe that a wargame scenario.

      • nednobbins@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        That’s a potential scenario in the event of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. I think it’s extremely unlikely for 2 major reasons:

        1. China has very little incentive to invade Taiwan. At the current trend, China can just smother Taiwan instead. China has repeatedly demonstrated that they can impose a 100% naval blockade on Taiwan and nobody has a plan for how to break that blockade.

        2. Even if China invaded Taiwan, somebody would have to actually do the act of blowing up all the Taiwanese chip plants. That would leave Taiwan without it’s single biggest asset in a post invasion scenario. There’s no reason to think it would reverse an invasion, it would just remove one of their biggest bargaining chip.

    • thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s a war. Factories get destroyed, skilled workers die. There’s no way China invades and chip production continues without a hitch all the way through. Even in the best case scenario I expect years of lowered outputs.

      • nednobbins@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        The question was why prices would go up after China had control of the chip factories. That’s an entirely separate question from how many of the chip factories would survive.

        But it’s also crazy to think that China would invade with boots on the ground. They’ve shown repeatedly that they can enforce 100% naval blockades on a moments notice and keep it up as long as they like. They can literally go back to medieval tactics and win via siege. That keeps Chinese military assets and personnel safe while also preserving infrastructure.

        You’re absolutely right that it almost certainly wouldn’t continue without a hitch. The blockade would stop all the raw material shipments and all the exports. Despite claims that Taiwan would blow up the factories themselves, I don’t see why they would; once a takeover was underway blowing them up wouldn’t serve as a deterrent but it would remove the ability to use them for negotiations.