• PhillyA92@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s a big no from me dog. I barely trust the government as it is, no way I’ll trust them with nuclear power plants. And besides we have vastly better options such as solar.

    • AxExRx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I read the 2 year old headline as 'unless green peace arms itself, countries will never take the environment seriously.

  • flossdaily@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Good!

    Anti-nuclear is like anti-GMO and anti-vax: pure ignorance, and fear of that which they don’t understand.

    Nuclear power is the ONLY form of clean energy that can be scaled up in time to save us from the worst of climate change.

    We’ve had the cure for climate change all along, but fear that we’d do another Chernobyl has scared us away from it.

    • AxExRx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I heard a bit from a podcast that stuck with me:

      ALL Energy is nuclear energy-

      The sun is a nuclear power source.

      Plants absorb that nuclear energy and whether we eat them, or eat animals that ate them, that is still energy from a nuclear source.

      Some of those plants ended up rotting for millenia underground, and we dig that up, now in the form of coal, oil or natural gasses- then burn it…thats still just nuclear power.

      Even the wind is nuclear power, as is its mostly caused by the uneven heating of the air by the sun, as the earth rotates, leading to the creation of higher and lower pressure areas.

      The podcast (which was about solar energy- i work for a solar panel company, thats why it was on in the work van, lol) went on to say that logically, nuclear, solar, to an extent wind are therefore the best ways to ‘generate/ harvest’ power- everything else is just laundering nuclear energy through an inefficient, and usually destructive battery.

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      imagine how much farther ahead we would be in safety and efficiency if it was made priority 50 years ago.

      we still have whole swathes of people who think that because its not perfect now, it cant be perfected ever.

      • danielbln@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        So uh, turns out the energy companies are not exactly the most moral and rule abiding entities, and they love to pay off politicians and cut corners. How does one prevent that, as in the case of fission it has rather dire consequences?