• HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    208
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    So, I looked at age verification - it was made clear photos were on device only and never transmitted.

    If this turns out to be false, then the legal fallout would be apocalyptic.

    (Edit: or not, see the comment by ambitiousprocess below)

    • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      116
      ·
      1 day ago

      These were photos submitted via the compromised support provider (Zendesk) via the Discord support portal.

      Automated age verification via their partner (k-ID, which has its own issues) is a separate system, which was only available to some users. Other users had to contact Discord support manually and submit photo ID, which went through Zendesk, which was then compromised in this breach.

      https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/360041820932-Help-I-m-old-enough-to-use-Discord-in-my-country-but-I-got-locked-out

      Additionally, for the automated process, it’s the video selfie that’s on-device and never transmitted, but photos of your ID and selfie photo are transmitted, just supposedly deleted afterwards. Those ones are *not included in this breach, as far as we’re aware, as it’s an entirely different third-party with wholly separate infrastructure.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        54
        ·
        1 day ago

        Which is why you farm off stuff like this to third parties whenever possible

        DiscordCorp will get a slap on the wrist and give people an offer of a free six months of discord turbo (so long as you provide payment info so it can auto-renew on month seven).

        But ANY meaningful consequences will go toward Zendesk Corp for not doing what they were supposed to. And… then everyone will just use ZZendesk instead

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Well, yeah. Discord isn’t exactly at fault here, they’re operating as best they can within the boundaries of a piece of legislation that could be best described as gods gift to the “I-told-you-so” crowd. This breach is exactly what everyone was warning would happen with the UK ID laws, and discord got stung first as they’re one of the few companies trying to adhere to the law in good faith (which, yes, why in hell they’re trying to do this is good faith is a very good question)

          • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            In my opinion, they’re still somewhat at fault, because this was them failing to find and configure their software to work with a third-party identity provider who’s infrastructure was built to handle the security of sensitive information, and just choosing to use email through Zendesk because it was easier in the meantime. A platform that I should note has been routinely accessed again and again by attackers, not just for Discord, but for all sorts of other companies.

            The main problem is that legislation like the Online Safety Act require some privacy protections, like not collecting or storing certain data unless necessary, but they don’t require any particular security measures to be in place. This means that, theoretically, nothing stops a company from passing your ID to their servers in cleartext, for example.

            Now compare this to industries like the credit card industry, where they created PCI DSS, which mandates specific security practices. This is why you don’t often see breaches of any card networks or issuers themselves, and why most fraud is external to the systems that actually process payments through these cards. (e.g. phishing attacks that get your card info, or a store that has your card info already getting hacked)

            This is a HUGE oversight, and one that will lead to things like this happening over and over unless it becomes unprofitable for companies to not care.

          • Axolotl_cpp@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            Literally days ago i was accessing a nsfw channel and i got “well, you should send to us your ID and things so i can verificate you” and i thought “no way! I don’t want to give my infos, if they have a data breach we are all doomed” and i ignore, well i don’t want to say “i told you so” but…

    • lemmyout@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      What legal fallout? Discord made users agree to new terms just a week ago that involves forced arbitration.

      • ms.lane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Sounds like Discord is about to have 2 million cases of arbitration to sort out.

        One person takes them to arbitration, it’s short work for their legal team, if 1000 do it’s harder, if 100,000 do, you still have to respond in a timely manner. The costs would be astronomical.

        Valve and a few others removed it for that reason, it’s a bomb waiting to blow.

      • Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Forced arbitration clauses are not legal in many European jurisdictions, so “agreeing” to them didn’t actually do anything.

        • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Are they legal in any EU jurisdictions? I’d hope not.

          Not to mention half of their TOS being illegal/unenforceable in the first place.

      • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Forced arbitration tends to backfire massively when you have something of this scale because of everyone starts doing it. The cost of that forced arbitration is more than what the lawsuits would have been without it. It’s a big reason why like steam got rid of it. If you get too many people trying to go after you, it’s just not worth it and costs too much.

    • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Here’s the information directly from the FAQ as of right now:

      Q: Is my data stored when I use Face Scan or Scan ID verification?

      A: Discord and k-ID do not permanently store personal identity documents or your video selfies. The image of your identity document and the ID face match selfie are deleted directly after your age group is confirmed, and the video selfie used for facial age estimation never leaves your device.

      • LyD@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        That sounds like the video stays on your device but the photos do not.

      • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Yeah, but those methods of verification weren’t the subject of this breach, this was some manual bullshit done through Zendesk.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Where is that small print? It should be archived before Discord tries to change it.