• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Putin is testing for years how far he can go. He uses salami tactics on NATO for ages.

    A bit of sabotage here, planes and drones flying in or over NATO territory, ghost ships and shadow fleets doing crimes, disturbing GPS, etc, etc, etc.

  • Lumisal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    A bunch of European businesses are still doing business with Russia, so doubt it’s true.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Define “ready”, Martin Jaeger. They’re second best in Ukraine, so it can’t be in terms of capacity to win.

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      14 hours ago

      If you disregard ability to win, any one of us is technically ready to attack Europe.

    • ms.lane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      They still have their usual ‘wunderwaffle’ to roll out - Waves of Humans and zero care for human lives.

      Russia is as dangerous now as Japan was in WW2.

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Japan had an aircraft carrier fleet rivaling the US, better carrier fighter planes than the US, and were occupying a lot of China, who was a peer opponent. It also took a US-USSR alliance to take them down.

        Russia on the other hand is able to wreak a lot of havoc, and is also good on some technological fronts, like drone warfare, espionage and ballistic missiles, but it has recently lost a lot of its fleet against an opponent with no navy, and is stuck in trench warfare with equipment that in WWII would be the equivalent of muskets.

        This whole posturing is because Russia ran out of easily recruitable people, and needs internal justification to start throwing in conscripts as well.

        Oh, BTW it’s “Wunderwaffe”, if you want a “Wunderwaffle”, go to Brussels, they put strawberries and cream on it so high it won’t fit in your mouth.

  • dwalin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Remember that they want Europe to be afraid and stockpile material that otherwise would go to ukraine.

    • mistermodal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It’s time for you guys to decide whether you want direct war with Russia or not. Imagining that they aren’t ready for it, and this is just a diversion, is seriously risky. I’m nervous with how Europeans are getting bolder the more Ukraine fails to fulfil its military objectives. Nobody is doing more than doubling down on political narratives that were dry in 2022.

  • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean this was true 20 years ago, it wasn’t as obvious before they invaded Georgia in 2008 (let alone now), but multi decade research (including research that accounts for preference falsification) has clearly shown a consistent level of support among a strong majority of russian society for genocidal imperialism.

      • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Russian society’s genuine love for genocidal imperialism has nothing to do with propaganda (if that’s what you were referring to).

        Mind you, they are fully capable of change, they just don’t want to and have no incentive to do (Westerners enabling and promoting their victim-hood narratives only contribute to this).

    • thecaptaintrout@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Ready to fuck around. Not ready to find out.

      Threatening and posturing to destabilize Europe and NATO, while going heavily on grey zone warfare and divisive misinformation campaigns. At the top, should not want any kinetic warfare against NATO, but rhetoric, ‘yes’ men, and arrogance may make some think they can and should.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Also and as somebody else pointed out, if makes sense for him to try and scare European nations so that they refrain from sending as many weapons and ammo to Ukraine because of thinking they might need those to defend themselves from Russia.

        So a sabble-rattling discourse and even the recent air-space intrusions by Russian military planes are cheap ways of trying to get the strategical gain of Ukraine receiving fewer weapons from the rest of Europe and even if those things fail he loses nothing from doing them (at this point, he’s hardly going to get in a worst situation than he already put himself in).

        It makes absolute sense to pursue a strategy where at best you gain something and at worst you lose nothing.

        Now, if the response to the Russian intrusion in European airspace had been for European nations to set up and enforce a no fly for Russia inside Ukraine, that would’ve definitelly been a loss for him (at the very least the rest of Europe would protect Western Ukraine from Russian drones and air assets, freeing Ukranian assets to be used elsewhere), but the leaderships of European nations have yet to show a willingness or capability to act decisivelly like that as a group: even the help with weapons and ammo took ages to get going properly, was riddled with “red lines” (like “no tanks”, then “no jets”, then “no long range cruise missiles” and who could forget the whole “can’t be used against Russian territory” artificial limitation) and there was a lot of feet-dragging, especially from Germany) so actual direct intervention even if only with air assets doesn’t seem likely as response to “mere” Russian air space intrusions and unconventional warfare that can be denied (cyber attacks, election interference, support for extreme political forces, cutting of undersea cables and so on).

      • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        23 hours ago

        That’s Putin, always claiming he’s got a royal flush even when just holding a pair to try to intimidate the opponent into folding. It’s the same every time.

        • thecaptaintrout@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Saddest part is his grand strategy is literally open source, i.e. “Foundations of Geopolitics”, written by a Russian ultra nationalist, taught in Russian military academy’s. Main points are weakening NATO and US by supporting internal strife and divisions, allowing Russia to take back its “land” and sphere of influence.

          Top many willing useful idiots for them to use. . .

          • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            So: divide and rule, and do as much imperialism as they can get away with.

            Guy must be some kinda fuckin’ genius.

          • Mangoguana@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I read that book, boy it’s a steaming crock of shit. They are following the worst book second to mein kampf that has soo many misconceptions that you really get a sense on why Russia is such a shithole.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Yeah, but that’s kind of what they’re already doing, in which case it’s not news. He’s implying they have some nebulous new kind of readiness.

        Maybe they do, maybe he’s just trying to get everyone on board with rearming. Which I guess is a good idea in any case.