Hot off the back of its recent leadership rejig, Mozilla has announced users of Firefox will soon be subject to a ‘Terms of Use’ policy — a first for the iconic open source web browser.

This official Terms of Use will, Mozilla argues, offer users ‘more transparency’ over their ‘rights and permissions’ as they use Firefox to browse the information superhighway — as well well as Mozilla’s “rights” to help them do it, as this excerpt makes clear:

You give Mozilla all rights necessary to operate Firefox, including processing data as we describe in the Firefox Privacy Notice, as well as acting on your behalf to help you navigate the internet.

When you upload or input information through Firefox, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license to use that information to help you navigate, experience, and interact with online content as you indicate with your use of Firefox.

Also about to go into effect is an updated privacy notice (aka privacy policy). This adds a crop of cushy caveats to cover the company’s planned AI chatbot integrations, cloud-based service features, and more ads and sponsored content on Firefox New Tab page.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    The only acceptable privacy policy for a browser is “we won’t fucking look into anything, take anything, nor send anything anywhere you didn’t actually wish to send explicitly”.

    Firefox have an extension system. If mozilla wants to bloat it, they should do it via extension, so that they’re not bloating the actually useful part. As it is, all they’re doing is forcing more work on people to manage forks to remove all the shit every time they push a release.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      /usr/lib/firefox-esr/browser/features
      has

      • formautofill@mozilla.org.xpi
      • pictureinpicture@mozilla.org.xpi
      • screenshots@mozilla.org.xpi
      • webcompat-reporter@mozilla.org.xpi
      • webcompat@mozilla.org.xpi
      • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        hey, why is this significant? I can guess what features these are linked to, but is there any significance to the email address-like formats?

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          They are the demanded features-as-extension, shipped by default. They do that since they got rid of XUL i think?

          About the @, no clue.

  • Bogasse@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 days ago

    I’ve been willingly enabling data collection features for Mozilla but I guess that time is revolute, they don’t feel trustworthy anymore.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Overhyped AI is going to fail, and it can’t happen soon enough. The Mozilla leadership really needs to pay attention to that reality.

  • mesamune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Man all this makes me want to just use Links2 for everything and being a luddite. Complete with cabin in the woods. So frustrating.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Where’s the gofundme for the firefox fork project?

    Was this from google turning off the funding tap?

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    can a chromium fork reasonably be maintained with adblock support?

    • scholar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 days ago

      This new policy doesn’t apply to Firefox forks so you’re better off with one of those

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        so in a similar vein: can the community reasonably maintain an up-to-date and secure gecko-based browser we can universally move to instead of firefox? can we make google back the fuck off while we do so? because thats what seems to be the way, with how things are going down.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        i also hate it, but i see no one else putting the amount of work necessary to maintain an entire browser engine. and mozilla clearly wants to enshittify.

        firefox has its days numbered. even if its not overnight and we have some time, we have to come up with something.

        anyone up to date on how servo is doing rn, btw?

    • cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Brave supports extensions still but it has its own issues.

      It’s getting hard to boycott companies and products when it starting to look like most are dipping their toes into stuff their users don’t like.

  • Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    I feel like everything is getting corroded, the capitalists are wearing down everything