I suppose you could argue that the smaller nation’s should all submit to the bigger nations since more people benefit from the bigger nations success
Define success. Pretty much every related study has concluded that smaller countries are most optimal. For pure communism, I think population number was extremly low, something like 500 per community. The richest country per citizen in Europe is also the smallest one. Baltics, having pretty much no natural resources or anything else valuable, are doing fine. Bigger countries tend to start really wasting money and become quite inefficient.
That’s the problem, I can’t define success, what good is a happy nation that can’t defend itself, what good is a well defended nation if everyone hates it?
Is it really good for the people that make up a country to sacrifice security for luxury or is it just a temporary distraction to get votes?
Define success. Pretty much every related study has concluded that smaller countries are most optimal. For pure communism, I think population number was extremly low, something like 500 per community. The richest country per citizen in Europe is also the smallest one. Baltics, having pretty much no natural resources or anything else valuable, are doing fine. Bigger countries tend to start really wasting money and become quite inefficient.
That’s the problem, I can’t define success, what good is a happy nation that can’t defend itself, what good is a well defended nation if everyone hates it?
Is it really good for the people that make up a country to sacrifice security for luxury or is it just a temporary distraction to get votes?