They are NOT deportees. They are not being deported.
They’re being RENDITIONED.
Deported people are sent back to their own countries where they likely have resources or the ability to live and function.
Renditioning is intentionally putting people in places where they have no ability to communicate or to live. It’s like a death sentence for at least many of them.
I’m going to disagree with you with two arguments: first, authority from Merriam Webster
Deport transitive verb 1 [Latin deportare] a : to send (a foreign-born noncitizen) out of the country by legal order : to subject to deportation b : to remove (someone or something) : DISPLACE
2 : to behave or comport (oneself) especially in accord with a code
Second argument is historical. During WWII, People were deported to concentration camps. They for sure didn’t call the camps their home.
Sick. Who does this help?
I don’t know who even upvoted you for this pointless bullshit
That’s it? That’s like an upper middle class boomer’s retirement fund. I presume much of the compensation is going to be in diplomatic concessions.
The article states that:
Eswatini agreed to take 160 deportees in exchange for $5.1m to “build its border and migration management capacity”.
By my account, that amounts to $31.875 per deportee.
Regardless of the sums involved, the United States are outsourcing their human rights abuses and bribing other countries to turn a blind eye by making them complicit. Eswatini and all the other countries that partake in “migration offshoring” schemes, like El Salvador, Albania and Rwanda, will likely not call out the United States, the United Kingdom or the European Union for their criminal treatment of people who, by and large, desire to work and live in peace.
