Invoking Vaclav Havel, he said it was time to stop pretending that what the western powers called a rules-based order was not a self-serving sham.

“Great powers can afford, for now, to go it alone. They have the market size, the military capacity and the leverage to dictate terms. Middle powers do not. But when we only negotiate bilaterally with a hegemon, we negotiate from weakness. We accept what’s offered. We compete with each other to be the most accommodating,” he said

“Being a happy vassal is one thing, being a miserable slave is something else,” he said.

“If you back down now, you’re going to lose your dignity, and that’s probably the most precious thing you can have in a democracy, it’s your dignity.”

  • RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    Who do you put your trust in when it comes to making economic and political decisions in the face of a generational existential threat to our sovereignty, as well as a massive, rapid and necessary restructuring of our economy?

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      To keep the status quo of ever widening income gaps and growing fascism a banker of course.

      Revolution requires people not invested in keeping a system that serves wealthy and their favorite proxy, the corporation, exclusively.

          • RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            It would properly express the respect I have for this conversation. Oh well, use your imagination.

                • Doomsider@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  20 hours ago

                  I don’t know. I mean as a dismissive element using crude humor is certainly effective. I can respect that to for what it is.

                  Was it funny in this context? I think you believe it was.

                  My reply was humourous to me because I imaged you as some pig human corporate shill shitting themself when they hear the truth. Not because they actually care, of course, but just because they felt the need to evacuate their bowels at that moment. Also letting out a series of progressively louder grunts mixed with squeals while the business is conducted.

                  • RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    18 hours ago

                    You’re overthinking it buddy. It’s a fart, it’s funny.

                    If you feel like you need to understand me to make it funny, then fill yer boots.

                    Edit honestly if you don’t find farts funny then you’re a loser because you’re choosing to have less joy in your life but the exact same amount of farts.